Where complexity
resolves.

We sit with your project managers for a week, ship Claude skills tuned to their templates, and train them to use it without calling IT. Built for infrastructure, construction, and professional services.

Begin the conversation See what we do
Currently piloting with Australian infrastructure and construction firms
The gap

Generic AI tools don't understand your documents, your processes, or your industry's obligations. Without someone to bridge that gap, adoption stalls at the pilot stage, or never starts.

Brevio closes that gap. We learn how your team works, build Claude to match, and leave your people capable, not dependent.

  • AI pilots that stall because the tools weren't built around how the team actually works.
  • Generic prompts that don't understand your document types, your clients, or your compliance obligations.
  • Workforce uncertainty: people unsure what to use Claude for, so they default to not using it.
  • Dependency on external tech teams for every new task, when the capability should live inside the business.
Capability audit

Project management · operations

12 workflows mapped
Inputs
Email & RFPs
Cost plans
Tender submissions
Site investigations
Claude ops
Outputs
Fee proposals 15-slide deck · 40 min
Payment certificates 5 files · monthly
Recommendation papers Word + Excel · per tender
Meeting notes Candidate
Site progress reports Manual
Automated Candidate Manual
skills/ team / pm-ops
5 skills
Search skills ⌘ K
  • fee-proposal.md Client RFP · 15-slide deck format
    2.1 KB today
  • progress-claim.md Monthly PC cycle · 5 output files
    1.8 KB 2d ago
  • tender-recommendation.md Word paper + Excel scoring matrix
    3.0 KB 1w ago
  • contamination-estimate.md Parametric cost model · NSW EPA rates
    2.4 KB 2w ago
  • contractor-comparison.md Tender evaluation scoring workbook
    1.5 KB 3w ago
  • Add skill
Synced with Claude workspace ~/brevio/team/pm-ops
Monthly claim · PC7 Fee proposal +
PM Project manager
Process the PC7 payment claim using last month's template.
C
Claude

Running the monthly payment claim skill. I'll work through the checklist and flag anything that needs a second look.

  • Parsed claim PDF 30 line items · 2.3s
  • Cross-checked invoice vs. schedule Flagged $300 mismatch on line 14
  • Rolled forward Excel assessment Previously claimed columns updated
  • Regenerated Progress Certificate PC7 · period ending 31 Mar
  • Merging ISSUED PDF... Cert + Assessment + Invoice + Stat Dec
xlsxPC7-Assessment docxProgress-Certificate pdfPC7-ISSUED
+ Ask a follow-up...
Where we operate

Built for industries
that can't afford to get it wrong.

Infrastructure

Large-scale civil, transport, and utilities projects where documentation and compliance burden is highest.

Management papers & board reports
Progress claims & contract review
Compliance documentation
Construction

Tier 1 and mid-market builders managing complex multi-party projects, subcontractor networks, and site operations.

RFIs & progress reports
Subcontractor correspondence
Site documentation
Professional Services

Engineering consultancies, legal firms, and advisory practices where knowledge work is the core product.

Client reports & proposals
Research synthesis
Knowledge retrieval
How we work

A measured process.
Capability that stays.

01
Discovery

We embed with the team to map workflows, outputs, and pain points. We trace exactly what gets produced, how it gets produced, and where time is lost.

02
Design

We design the Claude templates, skills, and workflow integrations that fit. Shaped around your documents, your language, and your team's specific way of working.

03
Build & Pilot

We build the templates and pilot them with a small group on real work. Iterate until they're producing outputs the team is proud to send out the door.

04
Rollout & Enablement

We train the wider workforce. When a new project lands, they feed it into Claude themselves. The capability belongs to the business, not to us.

Workflows we commonly tackle
Document review & summarisation
Procurement & tender analysis
Risk register management
Progress report generation
RFI & correspondence handling
Regulatory compliance checking
Meeting notes & action tracking
Knowledge base retrieval
Case studies

Built from the inside.

These case studies come from our own internal workflows. We dogfooded the methodology before taking it to market. This is the proof we built for ourselves first.

Documentation
From a week to a few hours

The problem. Management papers (the formal briefing documents prepared for steering committees and project control groups) took roughly a week to draft, review, and finalise. High-effort, high-repeat, produced across every live project in the portfolio.

The approach. Reviewed a library of past management papers to understand structure, tone, and decision-making logic. Built a Claude skill file that captures the template and reasoning. The PM now feeds raw project inputs (progress data, risks, issues, decisions needed) and gets a full first draft back.

Turnaround dropped from about a week to a few hours. The PM starts from 80% finished, not a blank page.
Commercial
Monthly claims on autopilot

The problem. Monthly progress claims and variation directions are repetitive, time-sensitive, and commercially critical. Every month, every project, same structure. And every month, hours of manual drafting.

The approach. Built a reusable Claude skill file for progress claim automation, designed for monthly reuse across any project on the book. The skill encodes commercial logic, formatting standards, and sign-off expectations.

A process that consumed significant PM time each month is now largely drafted by Claude from project inputs. One skill file, reused across projects indefinitely. This is the pattern that convinced us the model scales.
Procurement
Scoping new engagements in hours, not days

The problem. Drafting consultant briefs (scope-of-works documents that go out to engineering consultants and specialists) is a high-value, high-judgement task. Each brief is bespoke but shares structural DNA across projects. Done manually every time, it eats into the early phases of every new engagement.

The approach. Built a Claude skill that ingests project context (site information, scope boundaries, stakeholder requirements, risk context) and produces a structured first-draft brief. Applied across two live engagements with very different scopes: a utility decommissioning and demolition scoping project, and a separate mixed-use redevelopment engagement.

Same skill, two very different scopes. Demonstrates the core Brevio premise: build the template once, reuse it across the portfolio.
Reporting
End-of-week inputs. Client-ready reports.

The problem. Weekly and monthly client progress reports are the single most repetitive deliverable on the calendar. Same structure, same sections, same tone, every cycle, multiplied across every project on the book. Hundreds of hours of PM time a year spent on narrative writing rather than actual project work.

The approach. Built a Claude skill that ingests raw period inputs (progress notes, programme updates, RFI logs, cost movements, risk changes) and produces a structured, client-ready progress report matching each client's template. The PM feeds the data at cut-off and gets a full first draft back.

Reporting shifts from a multi-hour narrative writing exercise to a review-and-refine task. One skill file, compounding time saved every reporting cycle.
Get started

Ready to make
complexity resolve?

Talk to us about your workflows. We'll show you where Claude earns its place.

Begin the conversation See how we work
hello@brevio.com.au · brevio.com.au · Sydney, Australia